Skip to content

The Aquatic Ape (homo sapiens)?

January 27, 2014

Did our ancestors inhabit aquatic environments? Consider the ‘aquatic ape hypothesis’.

On March 5, 1960, professionally renowned and knighted marine biologist Alister Hardy delivered a speech proclaiming that humans evolved in an aquatic environment. Thus was borne what is today known as the ‘aquatic ape hypothesis’ of human evolution.  And while there are many doubts as to this theory’s veracity, the modern version is quite compelling.  As explained by the abstract to Niemitz 2010:

During the last century, approximately 30 hypotheses have been constructed to explain the evolution of the human upright posture and locomotion. The most important and recent ones are discussed here… The Amphibian Generalist Theory, presented first in the year 2000, suggests that bipedalism began in a wooded habitat. The forests were not far from a shore, where our early ancestor, along with its arboreal habits, walked and waded in shallow water finding rich food with little investment. In contrast to all other theories, wading behaviour not only triggers an upright posture, but also forces the individual to maintain this position and to walk bipedally. So far, this is the only scenario suitable to overcome the considerable anatomical and functional threshold from quadrupedalism to bipedalism. [bold added]

Niemitz goes on to show that this form of the ‘aquatic ape hypothesis’ is consistent with paleoanthropological findings, functional anatomy, energetic calculations, and evolutionary psychology.  And then of course…you have all the great evidence from modern human experience.

Consider babies, neuroscience, and freedivers.

Babies. Did you know that newborns are able to hold their breath upwards of 45 seconds?  It’s true, and studies suggest that newborns aren’t even apprehensive about it. Though babies lose this ability after about six months, they go on to develop a considerable amount of control over their breathing as adults, which is an involuntary reflex for many other mammals.

Then there is the evidence of ‘blue neuroscience’, or what the beautiful marine biologist Wallace J Nichols has positively termed ‘neuroconservation’. Nichols has found some really compelling evidence that suggests that our proximity to water impacts our performance, increases calm, diminishes anxiety, and increases professional success. (Keep an eye out for Wallace’s book this summer.)

229412_10150239678616672_712731671_8574447_2498856_n

A promotional image for Wallace’s annual Bluemind symposium.

Finally, freedivers.  About fifty years of sport freediving has led physiologists to rewrite their text books on several occasions. For the first part of the 20th century, in fact, it was believed that freedivers could go no deeper than about 50 meters because any deeper and the pressure could crush the rib cage. Then in 1961 famed Sicilian diver Enzo Maiorca hit 50 meters, and he began a much mythologized competition with Frenchman Jacques Mayol, who later hit 100 meters in 1976.

How did they do it? We now know water pressure and temperature induce the ‘mammalian dive reflex’, consisting of bradycardia, peripheral vasoconstriction, and, perhaps most amazingly, a defensive pooling of blood in the lungs during really deep dives. And freediving continues to reveal; only recently it was found that freedivers are more adept at maintaining blood acidity levels.

So are we all just uninformed aquatic apes?  We’ll perhaps never know, but what we do know is we are only scratching the surface of humanity’s potential to explore the ocean.

Kevin Costner as a mutant manfish in the movie Waterworld - the moder freediver's "wet" dream. (Sorry...bad joke...)

Kevin Costner as a mutant manfish in the movie Waterworld – the moder freediver’s “wet” dream? (Sorry…bad joke…)

4 Comments leave one →
  1. Suzanne Iudicello permalink
    January 27, 2014 6:59 pm

    Elaine Morgan speculated about what came to be called “the aquatic ape” in her 1972 book “Descent of Woman,” where in addition to lampooning the “Tarzanist” Savannah theory, she posited the first musings about female humans being able to survive because they took to the water. After much “women’s lib” criticism, she revised the book in 1982, to remove the feminist slant and present only scientific information in support of aquatic human evolution. Science historian Erika Milam offers this observation: “By uncoupling her feminism from her science, Morgan gained a wider audience but lost her theory’s scholarly heft. Were Morgan first publishing today, I hope she wouldn’t have to choose.” To add the distaff side of your summary of aquatic ape conversation, see Milam’s article here:

    http://www.theguardian.com/science/the-h-word/2013/may/13/aquatic-ape-elaine-morgan-history-science

    • January 29, 2014 11:50 am

      Ah, brilliant. I’m so fascinated with how science is obstructed by such narrow thinking. Have you ever seen this book, Mandarins of the Future by Nils Gilman? It was a terrific book that showed how modernization theory emerged from a small group of social scientists, and amazingly this theory went on to influence the who international development experiment that started in post-WWII America.

  2. Suzanne Iudicello permalink
    February 5, 2014 12:16 pm

    Fascinating! I had not read it, but just ordered it. Will share with a friend of my daughter who is headed to grad school to study urban planning. (and maybe a copy of Descent of Woman, too. ;->) Thanks for sharing title.

  3. February 19, 2014 2:51 pm

    Contrary to what prof.Niemitz (not Niemetz) thinks, AAT is not about wading (tapirs-hippos-swine wade on 4 legs) but about diving. Human ancestors during the Ice Ages (less than c 2 miil.yrs ago, not 6 mill.yrs as Elaine thought at the time) followed the coasts when spreading around the globe, feeding on waterside & shallow aquatic foods, incl.parttime diving for shellfish (& seaweeds?) in littoral waters. Only this can explain the drastic brain enlargement, very heavy bones, flat & long skull & projecting nose in Homo erectus & archaic relatives. Google
    -econiche Homo
    -misconceptions Verhaegen
    -Vaneechoutte Rhys Evans

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,172 other followers

%d bloggers like this: