Skip to content

English Does Not Do Seafood Any Justice

May 20, 2013

It is interesting to ponder how little attention the world pays to the oceans. This other 71% of the planet is all too often ignored.  I wonder if perhaps it is because we have such poor terms to talk about the ocean’s bounty.

So here’s food for thought. Consider our major protein categories and what species they comprise:

Chicken encompasses just 1 species: Gallus gallus domesticus

Pork encompasses just 1 species: Sus domesticus

Beef typically encompasses just 2 species (depending on your taxonomy): Bos taurus and Bos indicus

What about seafood?  This one term typically encompasses the 50-100 species most of us eat in the west…but there are in fact 15,000 species of edible aquatic animals.

Given the number and variety of seafood species, it seems to me we should all stop using this general term ‘seafood’ and start talking about these foods in far more precise language.  If we borrow from The Sea Around Us Project (SAUP), we might better break down seafood into 10 commercial groups including flatfish, anchovies, crustaceans, and cod-likes (see here).

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: